If one is trying to wade through hundreds of thousands of registered cockers, many of whose owners and affix's are long gone, its a reasonable step to try and organise the data under reasonable headings.
If Tasha is rolling up her sleeves and willing to type her fingers to the bones to make free and open access to such a wonderful resource, we should be jumping through hoops to assist.
That includes all information. Good, bad and ugly.
Puppy farming should be tackled through political action and organisation, as
requested in other areas of this forum.
Making a free, open list of every cocker registered has only one moral decision relevant to it - that to do it in the first place for those that will use it - us and future generations.
It has nothing to do with penciling in the anti puppy farming message again.
Tasha, a suggestion (in this discussion forum), Redo the thread in the Pedigree research subforum (not so discussion) asking the same question, followed by an editable (updated) alphabetised list.
If admin can close the topic to replys and make it a "sticky", then ask contributers to PM you additions after checking against the main list.
That way...
You get your info, which you want to share with us all. (Thank you)
Admin keeps a tidy forum.
Thread does not get infected by aggressive posts.
From my own meager research I fear they were the wrong three headings, I imagine most, especially for the first 80+ years breed for all options.
Unless there was a "Frankenstein" affix, who would have spliced for the
moral good of the breed, taking the best head, back, etc.
Q.
