The vets don't seem to be putting that much importance on the subject, well mine isn't - he is very matter of fact about the whole scenario. If THEY spoke with the manufacturers of Milbemax, I'm sure they would get a favourable response - i.e. the makers of Milbemax I'm sure would advise the veterinary profession if/when they are going to licence as a preventative. As for us, we are going around in circles still, at the mercy of the powers that be.
We have limited choices:
1. Advocate is licensed to prevent lungworm, so if you don't mind using these type of preventatives, this could be for you.
2. At the moment, we believe Milbemax offers a reduced amount of lungworm infestation if administered monthly (?), but we have no clue if it will ever be licensed to prevent lungworm, at least at the moment.
3. If a dog does become infected, then Panacur apparently treats a lungworm infestation.
So, I have opted for #2 in the hope my dog is getting some protection, as in view of the alternatives, this is the "best" choice, for me, at the moment.
Mel, thanks for the research you are doing, it is appreciated. I know you are doing your best to keep us informed but IMHO I feel we are banging our heads against a brick wall at the moment. The more we try to find answers, the more confused we become. I'm totally disappointed with the veterinary profession and the drug manufacturers who just seem unable to provide us with the information we require in order to provide the best we can for our dogs.
