Some of you may follow my blog post on my snapping cocker spaniel Jake.
One of the most interesting things we learned from a behaviourist was the idea of "trigger stacking" - or rather, a stressful event may lead to greater stress that builds up over time and can make aggression more likely.
We had 4-5 months of no incidents with Jake, but then last week, I got a bit overfamiliar with him while he was sleeping on the sofa (stroked his ear) and got snapped at. Nothing serious, but since then, we've had 4 incidents (back to where we were this time last year).
Around this time we also had a groomer in, and we know being handled is a big source of stress for Jake, and he was noticeably more anxious for a few days afterwards.
It all just reaffirms to me that hardcore dominance / punitive methods just would not be effective on Jake, and would just raise his anxiety up by way of trigger stacking. My opinion is it could either go two ways - we may have less snaps, but when he did bite they would be more serious (as he'd be at his threshold of stress). Alternatively, it might just make no difference, we'd have the same amount of bites but they would get more serious as his "warnings" aren't working. Treating stress with more stress seems illogical for everyone, so we're gonna keep at the positive training even though it does feel at times as if we are just ignoring the problem
On another note, we've just moved to St Neots, near Cambridge and are having some lovely walks!