I get where you are all coming from, but it still leaves a real bitter taste in your mouth. Breeders should not be able to get away with buyer a dog with endorsements and then just ignoring them; it's not them it hurts but the likes of me. But when a reputable stud sells a dog to another breeder stating that the dog can't be bred from, what do they think they want the dog for?? Its obvious they are going to breed from them. Why don't they castrate before selling the dog?
I wil be doing some kind of shows with my dog. In fact I'm going to a show this weekend coming, a pedigree class and then in the afternoon a obedience class. We start agility next week, my vet was very worried about my dog starting agility until he was 18 months old.
We enjoy our hospital visiting and gun dog classes too, but I will always regret not being able to get him KC registered... you have to put the boot on the other foot and see it from my perspective, I feel kinda 'cheated'. I couldn't not get my last cocker registered because he was an american x english cocker cross, so I waited for nearly 13 yrs to get what I thought was a cocker I could get registered, all to no avail. I'm not getting any younger so probably won't buy another. I was considering buying one of my puppy's siblings as they are adorable, but now, not so sure.
In reply to an earlier question; I was given written confirmation that my puppy's sire was DNA and FA tested. So checked this against the list on the KC web site, and yes his father was on thier as tested clear - so he shouldn't be carrying the defective genes. And his mother's parents were clear too. I'm not sure I like what I've stumbled accross. I thought I was going to have a good time, meeting like minded people and just have good fun. But it seems there is a dark and more sinister side to the dog breeding world.
According to KC law, you do have to be made aware at the time of the purchase of the said puppy that it has endorsements on it - my puppy's breeder had do idea that the bitch she bought, his mother has endorsements. When she bought the bitch she was never made aware, but my puppy's breeder is a true 'home breeder' / hobby breeder selling cockers as 'pets' not for showing or breeding so it did not matter that she was not KC registered. But she wanted to register this litter she has just bred, but now she will not be able to.
It does annoy me when you see the words 'hobby breeder' written write accross thier home web page when you know for a fact they have 24 breeding bitches in outside buildings along with stud dogs... that's not a 'hobby breeder' that's a 'commercial' breeder! The puppies are not socialised like it says on their ad, how could they socialise that many pups?- It's just a breeding factory for money.
At least I purchased my puppy from a true 'hobby breeder' he was born at home and well socialised with everything that you would expect them to be socialised with. My puppy's breeder could take this further, but doesn't want to upset the apple cart. It doesn't bother me, I have nothing to lose. I have written to the KC, just waiting on thier reply. The KC do get involved if purchasers were not made aware of endorsements when they purchased their puppies, and that is definitely the case here, with me and my puppy's breeder. Yes you could say she was naive too, but everyone starts out somewhere, we have both learnt the hardway.